I just saw a movie,called "Wall Street---Money never sleeps". considering it's a suggested movie about finance to students who major finance,like me ,I saw it this morning.
However,being educated in chinese during our class, with my poor english and the weak translation from a website, frankly,I can hardly catch every words in this money,especially when they were talking some professional terms about
financle things or some government or some human being characteristic or something else, ,,
But,from the point of view of an ordinary audience, I can only dig out some simple relationship between those roles. in this money fight, can't say which one a good guy or a bad guy,or who is doing the right thing or wrong thing.
1987年的旧作《华尔街》我没有看过,对于金融业,我更是个彻头彻尾的门外汉,这也许是观看这部《华尔街Ⅱ》的限制,却也可以说抛除了藩篱,让我可以用更简单、直接的眼光去判断,回归电影的本质,也就是判断一个故事是否精彩,情节是否生动,人物塑造是否成功。就这个角度来讲,《华尔街Ⅱ》完全可以打出80以上的优良分数。叙述流畅的故事,跌宕起伏的情节,生动刻画的人物,附赠养眼的帅哥美女和一群西装革履的精英大叔以及真正贵气堂皇(没有国内所为“高端、时尚”类电影的一股山寨土气)大气磅礴的场景(高端商务聚会,大型慈善party,人流熙熙攘攘的华尔街,忙碌嘈杂的交易所……)
虽然说,金融概念白痴如我,也看得出《华尔街Ⅱ》中的种种商战,人物的大起大落,成功失败都太过简单和儿戏,只是为了让故事好看,将现实中极其复杂的商战浓缩成两个小时的戏剧化手段,不过此剧也很好地照顾了大众的理解程度,深入浅出却又煞有介事地勾勒出华尔街这个“金钱永不眠”的商业帝国中人与人之间无数的勾心斗角尔虞我诈。就“煞有介事”这一点来说,不得不承认
离开南京前看的最后一部电影。
偌大的放映厅里稀稀落落的坐着不到10个人。可能是因为原版片加中文字幕的关系。
阵容不用说,称得上豪华无比。剧情只能算一般,有些地方转折过快。比如男主的女友起先不愿意动用她父亲的钱,后来被男主一顿说服,瞬间眉开眼笑,当时看着觉得此女思维跳跃也太快了。
其次,男主打入“敌方”内部被发现,对方为什么不把他干掉呢?流言啊,买凶啊,刹车失灵啊....不要认为我说的话有点胡搅蛮缠。要知道,男主的“伯乐”不就是被他的对手迫害以至跳地铁自杀了吗? 难道男主也像漫画中一样符合小强定律吗?
道格拉斯老大爷最后也因为未来的孙子归还了女儿的钱,女儿和男主幸福的拥抱。感觉此女很“贪财”,说是男主骗她才分手,可是最后钱一回来了就又接纳男主了....哎...瑕疵啊瑕疵
画面也有瑕疵,赛车那段,看着觉得拍摄很粗糙。比芒果台的电视剧拍摄还要次。不过还好只有那一段看起来很假,其他都不错。
人性剖析比较深刻,其实就是一句话“人都是贪婪的,越有钱越贪”
good money
bad money
clean money
dirty money
someone like them all
someone need them all
someone love them all
Good day, I'm ok. Bad day, I'm ok. You tell me what's the difference?
Money's a bitch that never sleeps.And if you don't pay close attention,you wake up in the morning, and she might be gone forever.
What is the definition of insanity? It's doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. By that standard, most of us are insane. But not at the same time. And on that basis we trust. But can this way of life endure if more and more people are insane at the same time? It becomes, as Gordon said, "Systemic".
Like cancer.
20年过去了, 道格拉斯已老, 但Systemic愈演愈烈.
“回到高点的感觉不错吧”然而,对于这部电影我想说,高点太多却缺乏层次,完全没有渐入佳境,套中套到最后恍然大悟的灵光一闪,所以这种感觉却可不大好。到最后以一张B超cd(是这么叫的吧)引发一个冰释前嫌的大团圆结局似乎有点缺乏铺垫。戈登说 we are all mixed bags ,但是导演在人性的complicated的表现上凡善可陈的。还好我是抱着看帅哥萌女的心态来的。ps.学到会用到的词汇tulip manie 郁金香狂热 pps.我本来想写短评但是发现最重要的tulip manie部分因字数限制无法记录,故迫不得已,以影评之名。
华尔街:金钱永不眠:“系统性”话术?骗术?
转载请注明网址: https://www.zhizhudc.cn/pro/19513.html